If you've ever walked through a city you might have noticed tiny 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like small boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
safe distance from cell tower are replacing the larger built cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy could be harmful to human health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It's usually 1.6 Watts per kilogram averaged over one Gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This can lead to various potential problems, including an increased appearance of skin disorders such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 measured over 1 cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
what is a safe distance from a cell tower
In the event that you've used cell phone, you probably know that a safe location from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is due to the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the further away you are from it.
Although this may sound like an ideal idea, the reality is that those living close to towers could be more prone to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50 meters of cell towers experienced much more health problems than those living further away from the antennas.
This study showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a few days. safe distance from cell tower have also revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.
This is because RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is vital to be aware of because the skin acts as a shield against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. It is also the biggest organ in the human body, and is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon numerous assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. They include the incorrect belief that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
This also overlooks the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of the modulated RF signal, as well as the effects of brief bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.
Furthermore, the ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of radiation exposure. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation and other agents in the environment could produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This can lead to an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For example, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.